in documents sent by Microsoft to the CMA orBritish antitrust The Redmond house, which investigated the acquisition of Activision Blizzard, also directly criticized UK antitrust. agrees to Sony’s requests without conducting adequate investigations and without assessing the position of consumers in the matter.
As we can see in the defense documents, Microsoft is particularly reluctant to consider Sony’s concerns about the future of Call of Duty, also given its ability to release exclusives, but among the statements there is also a circular to the CMA, which is quite clear. from accepting Sony’s requests without reason and in essence seeking to maintain its market-leading position It’s more than just seeing the possible impact on consumers.
“These theories about the damage it can take are not sufficient to justify a move to Phase 2,” Microsoft wrote, citing the fact that the CMA has recently moved to Phase 2 investigations that include a more in-depth analysis of the situation. According to the company, it would have been driven by Sony’s unfounded concerns.
“The idea that the market leader with a clear and lasting power in this regard could be suppressed by the third console manufacturer due to the lack of free access to a single game is not credible,” the documents said. “Sony may not welcome increased competition, but have the opportunity to adapt and compete‘ says Microsoft.
According to Xbox House, “Sony is not in hypothetical suffocation, and the indictment decision is erroneously based solely on Sony’s claims that significantly exaggerate the importance of Call of Duty and fail to demonstrate Sony’s open competitive ability.” It also cites statements by “video game industry commentators” that the CMA’s motivation appears to have been “written as if Sony wanted to maintain its dominant position in the video game market”.
Source: Multiplayer
