Nothing lasts forever – a saying worth repeating to the creators of the Call of Duty series. According to them, the immortal gaming brand has been attracting players for more than twenty years with crazy shootings, a simple plot and many modes such as multiplayer and Zombies. But where do you want to move a piece that deals with historical or current events and has minimal room for any creativity? Just like Call of Duty, you’re building a brand you love. factory of mediocre games, which from year to year are a little shorter, and sometimes worse. You start reworking the stories you’ve already told and you start selling players what they have been playing for a long time. Simply put, you start robbing yourself. And you will repeat this until it comes to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III. That is the moment when you really screw up.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III is a reimagining of the third part of the famous sub-series from 2011., which, in addition to the single-player campaign, also includes a multiplayer mode and a Zombies mode. And at the same time, it is a work that should not have been created at all, as evidenced by the fact that it was originally supposed to be an expansion of the previous title. And that’s more than can be said about him. At first glance, the sequel tries to pretend that it is bringing something completely new. But if you look closely you will realize that each of the three proposed modes simply blatantly and inappropriately exploits what the series has long come up with.. This is the credo of every Call of Duty game, but in this case, none of the modes work quite right. And you’ll feel it most in the story campaign, which centers on the most iconic villain of the entire series.
Source :Indian TV
